“I Was No Longer Afraid to Die. I Was
Now Afraid Not to Die.”
The secret subject of Joan Didion’s
work has always been her troubled daughter. Her wrenching new memoir tells us
why.
Reading
Joan Didion on any subject is like tiptoeing across a just-frozen pond filled
with beautiful sharks. You look down and pray the ice will hold. Meeting her is
not a vastly different experience.
Opening the door to her cavernous Upper East Side
apartment, the writer murmurs a monotone “hello” but doesn’t shake hands. There’s
bottled water, she says, waving in the direction of a double-size Sub-Zero in
her double-size kitchen. She wears a sun-faded white sleeveless skirt-suit
fashioned from the raw silk curtains in her old house in Brentwood. She is 76
but looks older. She has always been birdlike, five two and wire-thin, but
never quite this frail. Her arms are translucent river systems of veins. Her
face is worn, unyielding. “She doesn’t express it,” says her agent and friend
Lynn Nesbit, but “you see the pain in her face.”
It’s true that drawing out her feelings in person
is a doomed project—that ice is thicker than it looks. Possibly the best living
American essayist and probably the most influential, Didion has always
maintained that she doesn’t know what she’s thinking until she writes it down.
Yet over the past decade, she’s been writing down more about her own life than
ever before. If you want to know about her upbringing, read Where I Was
From, about the delusions of her California pioneer ancestors. If you
want to know how she feels about the sudden 2003 death of her husband, the
writer John Gregory Dunne, you can read The Year of Magical Thinking, her
stark but openhearted account of emotional dislocation. And if you want to know
how she feels about the drawn-out death of her adopted daughter, Quintana Roo,
two years later at the age of 39, you can order her new memoir, Blue
Nights, on Amazon.
Having dissected the pain of others for decades,
Didion has spent the last few years turning the scalpel on herself. This introverted
late phase is as coherent and revealing as Philip Roth’s. The essayist who once
reprinted her own psychological evaluation has always used her personal story,
but in her early years she only feinted at confession on the way to
observations of the larger world. Beginning with Where I Was
From, which presents California’s history as her own, she’s reversed
the bait-and-switch, writing about those close to her as a way of bringing
herself, finally, into public view.
“Writers are always selling somebody out,” Didion
wrote at the beginning of her first essay collection, 1968’s Slouching
Towards Bethlehem. That warning, later echoed infamously by Didion’s
contemporary Janet Malcolm, is a statement of mercenary purpose in the guise of
a confession: not a preemptive apologia but an expression of grandiose, even
nihilistic ambition. We think of memoirs, especially memoirs of grief, as a
soft art, one that necessarily humanizes the writer. And Didion the memoirist
is painfully human—heartsick, vulnerable, and honest about her fears. But she’s
also as ruthless as she’s ever been, tearing down the constructs she’s built to
protect herself and her family. If she’s selling anyone out with Blue
Nights, it’s Joan Didion.
The book is about many things: mental illness,
fate, and our overgrown faith in medical technology. But it is most importantly
a reckoning with her shortcomings as a mother. Quintana died just six weeks
before the publication of The Year of Magical Thinking, after
a lifetime of suffering and a series of cascading illnesses (pneumonia, septic
shock, pulmonary embolism, brain bleeding) exacerbated by emotional
difficulties for which Didion wonders if she’s partly responsible. “I don’t
think anybody feels like they’re a good parent,” Didion tells me. “Or if people
think they’re good parents, they ought to think again.”
In Blue Nights, Quintana’s
truncated, troubled life is interwoven with Didion’s own physical decline. The
title, she explains, comes from those twilights that linger in northern
latitudes in the early summer, giving the eerie impression that darkness might
never come. “I found my mind turning increasingly to illness, to the end of
promise, the dwindling of the days, the inevitability of the fading, the dying
of the brightness. Blue nights are the opposite of the dying of the brightness,
but they are also its warning,” she writes. And later: “I was no longer, if I
had ever been, afraid to die: I was now afraid not to die.”
The Year of Magical Thinking transformed
Didion, who looks today like the world’s unlikeliest self-help guru. Perched on
a white slipcovered love seat in front of the fireplace in her split-level
living room—which is where her husband died—she speaks reluctantly but in
sudden crescendos, punctuated by nervous laughs. On a vast coffee table between
us sit neatly stacked books of all sizes—many of them unread, she tells me. And
all around—on shelves, mantels, and dressers, and arrayed along a hallway that
leads to two offices and two bedrooms—are pictures of mostly bygone family. “I
hadn’t thought that I was generally a pack rat, but it turns out I am,” she
says, showing me around the orderly apartment. “Everything here is a mess.”
Quintana, Dunne, and Didion in Malibu,
California, 1976.
(Photo: John Bryson/Time Life Pictures/Getty
Images)
|
By far the best-selling book of her nearly
half-century career, The Year of Magical Thinking sold more
than a million copies and made its author, for the first time, a truly public
figure, even a kind of literary saint—no longer a cult favorite but a celebrity
writer embraced by book clubs and heralded in airport bookstores. That success
was a disorienting shock, she says—especially the crowds. “People would stop me
in airports and tell me what it had done for them,” she tells me. “I had no
clue; I hadn’t done anything as far as I could see.” When that happens, “I go
remote on them,” she says. “I actively do not want to be a mentor. I never
liked teaching, for that reason.”
Nonetheless, she got busy touring. “I promised
myself that I would maintain momentum,” she writes dispassionately in Blue
Nights of a mourning period she filled with distractions. She let
Scott Rudin persuade her to adapt Magical Thinking into a play
directed by playwright David Hare. Vanessa Redgrave was the star. Critics would
complain Redgrave was far too large and strident to play Didion, who weighed
less than 80 pounds. The crew set up a table backstage, which they called Café
Didion, in order to make sure she ate daily.
And Didion kept working, tirelessly. There were
screenplays, which she had so often written with her husband: a movie on
Katharine Graham and an adaptation of her novel The Last Thing He
Wanted. There were also articles for The New York Review of
Books, including a takedown of Dick Cheney and a devil’s-advocate
essay on the vegetative Terri Schiavo—an essay she says she wrote for reasons
unrelated to Quintana’s hospital experiences.
She continued to see friends, as she still does
today, a few times a week. Some of them insisted Didion take a vacation. She
was in her seventies, after all, and had just lost both members of her
immediate family, then wrestled with the loss in a remarkably public way. One
day, during the run of the play, she came down with a very bad case of
shingles. A doctor said she was making an “inadequate adjustment to aging.” She
corrected him: She was making no adjustment to aging. Instead of taking a
vacation, she began to think about another, more painful project.
“My intention had been to make Magical
Thinking less polished, and I thought I had done that until I finished
it,” Didion says. “And then I realized that it was exactly as polished as
everything I wrote had always been.”
She set out to try something rougher—though not
quite as rough, she says, as the book she ultimately published. “I was going to
make it more theoretical than it turned out to be, less specifically about
Quintana,” she says. “It was going to be much less personal.” Instead, she
wrote the most personal, wrenching book of her life. Magical Thinking, not
exactly a breezy piece of work, “simply wrote itself,” she says. “This did not
write itself.”
Didion has always been known for the crystal sheen
of her writing—as a child she retyped pages from A Farewell to Arms—and
the seeming casualness of her prose has long divided readers. The critic John
Lahr once condemned Didion for suffusing her writing with nothing more than her
own anomie, which he memorably called “the Brentwood Blues. She meditates on
her desolation and makes it elegant,” he wrote. “Sent to get the pulse of a
people, Didion ends up taking her own temperature. Narcissism is the side show
of conservatism.”
And yet Didion owes her stature to more than
solipsistic style. She’s also a soothsayer, always timely and often prescient.
By virtue of her age—just ahead of the baby-boomers, young enough to recognize
them and old enough to see them clearly—Didion has made a career as a canary in
the American coal mine. In the sixties, she observed, from the vital center,
the dangers of the counterculture, and long before Woodstock. Beginning in the
nineties, she anticipated the shallow polarization that now dominates American
politics. In the aughts, just in advance of aging contemporaries like Joyce
Carol Oates, she anatomized the pain of widowhood. And, in Blue Nights, she
warns against the false comforts of helicopter parenting and industrial
medicine.
In each case, she makes the story her own—slyly
conflating private malaise and social upheaval, a signature technique that has
launched a thousand personal essayists. But sometimes it’s difficult to tell
which of her confessions are genuine and which calculated for literary effect,
how much to trust her observations as objective and how much to interrogate
them as stylistic quirks. Her clinical brand of revelation can sometimes feel
like an evasion—as likely to lead the reader away from hard truths as toward
them.
In person, Didion does concede to me the occasional
hard criticism. She admits that her writing might lack empathy, even human
curiosity. “I’m not very interested in people,” she says. “I recognize it in
myself—there is a basic indifference toward people.”
But there
is one critique that still gets her hackles up, decades later. In “Only
Disconnect,” published in 1980, Barbara Grizzutti Harrison called Didion a
“neurasthenic Cher” whose style was “a bag of tricks” and whose “subject is
always herself.” That wasn’t the worst of it: “My charity does not naturally
extend itself,” Harrison wrote, to “someone who has chosen to burden her
daughter with the name Quintana Roo.” Asked 25 years later, in this magazine,
whether she felt Magical Thinking was criticproof, Didion
replied, “Not if my daughter’s name wasn’t criticproof.”
It’s a telling scar. From the very beginning of her
career, family has been the secret heart of Didion’s work, the empathic center
of that otherwise icy moral universe. Critics may charge Didion with a lack of
feeling for her subjects, but her reverence for blood ties and her esteem for
clan loyalty animate everything she wrote about the social disorder wrought by
the generation that followed hers. Didion took the title of Slouching
Towards Bethlehem from the apocalyptic Yeats poem “The Second Coming,”
with its proclamation that “the center cannot hold.” For her, the true center
that could not hold was the family—sacrificed, she felt, on the altar of
universal love and self-fulfillment. No Didion scene is more evocative than the
kicker of the title essay of Slouching Towards Bethlehem: A
neglected 3-year-old hippie child, having just burned his arm in a fire, is
caught chewing on an electrical cord.
The real engine of this scene, Didion now
acknowledges, was Quintana, whom she worried that she was herself neglecting.
“I was leaving her alone while I was in San Francisco,” she says. “I went home
to Los Angeles on weekends, and she would turn her face away when I would kiss
her because I had been away for a week. So I was feeling very strongly the
sense of failing at parenting there.” In her libertarian cri de coeur, “On
Morality,” Didion criticizes the tendency of social movements to “assuage our
private guilts in public causes.” It wasn’t just the American family she was
worrying about, but her own.
Blue Nights dwells on the warning signs of Quintana’s incipient instability,
which one doctor diagnosed as borderline personality disorder. It started,
Didion now believes, at a very young age, perhaps not long after she was
adopted at birth. (Didion and Dunne had tried and failed to conceive for two
years.) As a toddler, Quintana would go on about a “Broken Man” who haunted her
nightmares. At age 5, she called Camarillo, the mental institution rumored to
have inspired “Hotel California,” to ask what she should do if she went crazy—a
story Didion insists is not just family lore. When Quintana got chicken pox,
she told her parents coldly, “I just noticed I have cancer.”
At 14, she informed them that she’d written a novel
“just to show you”: It involved a girl named Quintana who got pregnant. Her
parents “said that they would provide the abortion but after that they did not
even care about her any more … Her father had a bad temper, but it showed that
they cared very much about their only child. Now, they didn’t even care any more.”
Didion had always wanted to be a novelist. Like Tom
Wolfe and Susan Sontag, she grew up thinking she was put on Earth to write
fiction, and it’s in her novels that she is typically most revealing and
reflective. They usually feature a distant woman, intelligent but inscrutable
and generally fatalistic. Almost invariably, she has a troubled daughter.
In Play It As It Lays, she writes
about a 4-year-old who’s in treatment for “an aberrant chemical in her brain.”
In A Book of Common Prayer, a broken woman finds herself in a
fictional banana republic, dreaming of being reunited with her daughter, a
fugitive radical. (“It was about having your children grow up,” Didion realizes
now. “Quintana was reaching that age.”) Inez Victor, the mother inDemocracy, published
when Quintana was 18, has the all-too-familiar “capacity for passive
detachment,” but in the course of the novel she is forced into action when her
daughter, Jessie, runs off to Vietnam just before the 1975 evacuation of
Americans. One night, Inez discovers Jessie prostrate in her bedroom with a
heroin needle in her Snoopy wastebasket. “Let me die and get it over with,”
Jessie says. “Let me be in the ground and go to sleep.”
“Let me be in the ground and go to sleep,” a
teenage Quintana is quoted as saying, several times, in Blue Nights. Or,
rather, she is quoted once, while depressed, on the floor of their Brentwood
home. But, having appropriated the line for Democracy,Didion appropriates
it once more inBlue Nights, repeating the phrase again and again
throughout the book, like a mantra of self-flagellation.
It’s
unclear when exactly Quintana began exhibiting what Didion calls “quicksilver
changes of mood,” or when she first became depressed, or when she began to have
problems with alcohol. It’s also unclear, even in Didion’s mind, whether she
and Dunne had anything to do with it. Dissecting herself in Blue
Nights, Didion seems unable to decide if she was too coddling as a mother—“I
had been raising her as a doll”—or too cold—“Did we demand that she be an
adult?” She did once bring up her parenting with a grown-up Quintana, she says.
Her daughter reassured her, sort of: “I think you were a good parent, but maybe
a little remote.”
If Didion was remote with Quintana, she was
consumingly close to the third member of the family, her husband, John Gregory
Dunne. The central, immutable premise of both memoirs is John and Joan’s
idyllic marriage—the one Utopia in which the skeptical Didion placed her faith.
“They were always together,” as their old friend Calvin Trillin puts it. “They
could finish each other’s sentences.” Working on screenplays together, they
did. Beginning with The Panic in Needle Park, they embarked on a
lucrative career that put them in rarefied celebrity company and earned them,
for the indignity of not having final cut, paychecks that made them two of the
highest-paid screenwriters in Hollywood. In this setting, as in others, Joan
was the greater writer but the lesser social force—the observer. “I liked being
on set more than John did,” Didion says, “because you could just sit there and
have other people do things around you. You could just watch.”
Quintana didn’t always fit easily into this
universe of two; sometimes she must have felt like the clumsy apprentice in a
sleek dream factory. Susan Traylor, Quintana’s best friend since nursery
school, used to envy the structure of Quintana’s household—but Quintana envied
the freedom of Traylor’s. “It used to drive her crazy that her parents were so
on top of things,” says Traylor. She remembers warmly one ride to elementary
school with Dunne and his daughter. Quintana showed him a paper she was going
to turn in. He asked her if she’d given it to him or Didion to proof, and when
she said no, he threw it out the window. There’s an echo of that moment
in Blue Nights, when Didion unearths a journal Quintana
kept—in which Quintana dwelled on her “present fear of life”—and finds herself
proofreading it. “Considerable time passes before I realize that my
preoccupation with the words she used has screened off any possible
apprehension of what she was actually saying.”
Quintana went to college at Bennington, where
Didion had wanted to go (she’d studied at Berkeley instead). “I think the only
reason she stayed there for two years,” Didion says, “was that she was
immediately too depressed to think about transferring.” On a visit late in
Quintana’s sophomore year, Didion knew something was terribly wrong, and
persuaded Quintana to transfer to Barnard, where her mood improved markedly.
But there were many ups and downs. “There was something going on in her head,”
Didion tells me. “There was more going on in her head than I was thinking
about.”
But by her early thirties, Quintana seemed to have
gained some traction. A promising photographer—her pensive landscapes are
scattered throughout Didion’s apartment—she had become the photo editor
at Elle Decor. She talked to her mother daily, about “what she
was doing at work,” says Didion, “why she was mad at so-and-so, why that seems
to me an unworthy reason to be mad at so-and-so.” So-and-so was often Dunne.
“They fought about everything,” Didion says. “They just fought.” She adds that
the fights didn’t abate after Quintana left home; if anything, they got worse.
Then, one Saturday in 1998, Quintana got a FedEx
package from her birth sister, whom she had never known, and flew down to
Dallas to meet the rest of the clan. (Didion had learned the names of
Quintana’s biological parents by accident, and writes that she dreaded the
possibility that they’d ever meet Quintana.) Her birth mother began calling all
the time, interfering with her job. Quintana tried to declare a temporary
break, but her birth mother overreacted, disconnecting her phone. Soon after
that, her birth father got in touch. He wrote, “What a long strange journey
this has been.” Quintana responded with what became the funniest line in Blue
Nights. “ ‘On top of
everything else,’ she said through the tears, ‘my father has to be a Deadhead.’ ”
Didion doesn’t dwell on what followed, either in
person or in the book. (“Just look at the size of it,” she says now. “Clearly
I’ve left stuff out.”) Dunne’s nephew Griffin Dunne says meeting the birth
family “had an enormous effect on Quintana, and not for the better.” Her
newfound relatives “were a troubled lot, and it struck Quintana: ‘That’s my DNA
too; am I more like that or am I more like my parents?’ It was the beginning of
a real emotional struggle.”
“Because she was depressed and because she was
anxious she drank too much,” Didion writes in Blue Nights. “This
was called medicating herself. Alcohol has its well-known defects as a
medication for depression but no one has ever suggested—ask any doctor—that it
is not the most effective anti-anxiety agent yet known.”
At some point it became impossible to figure out whether
depression was causing the alcohol abuse or vice versa. One family friend would
call it “alcohol personality disorder.” “Was it sick or was it
self-destructive?” the friend asks. “Or was the self-destructive part covering
up the part that was sick? It’s one of those chicken-or-the-egg questions, and
as a mother, you want to solve it so that you can see one’s potential
realized.”
At loose ends, Didion began seeing a therapist. “I
think she was very interested in how she could better communicate with
Quintana,” says a friend. The counseling helped her realize she’d been
infantilizing her grown daughter. These are thoughts that went straight into Blue
Nights: “She was already a person. I could never afford to see that.” In
person she is more pointed: “I had treated Quintana like a baby and not a human
being.”
She also realized that she might have treated
herself the same way—reluctant to play the grown-up in the family. “One of her
abiding fears,” she writes of Quintana, perhaps projecting her own worries,
“was that John would die and there would be no one but her to take care of me.”
But gradually, Didion did begin to grow more assertive and more reflective,
prompted by her therapist, by her troubles with her daughter, and especially by
the death of her mother, in 2001.
Unsurprisingly, the first sign of that
transformation was in her writing. Where I Was From tore apart
the California pioneer mythos that had shaped her emotional life and driven so
much of her work. “That was a book that was very important to her,” says her
friend Christopher Dickey, “and it didn’t get much of a reception at all.
People didn’t understand it. My wife and I both read it in galleys, and my
wife, who is very sensitive and very close to Joan as well—she said, ‘This is
really about Quintana … She was kind of Slouching Towards Quintana.’ ”
Near the end of the book, Didion walks with her
mother and Quintana through a re-created section of Old Sacramento. Quintana is
5 or 6, and Didion wants to explain her family’s roots there. But then, she
realizes, “Quintana was adopted. Any ghosts on this wooden sidewalk were not in
fact Quintana’s responsibility,” she writes. “In fact I had no more attachment
to this wooden sidewalk than Quintana did: It was no more than a theme, a
decorative effect. It was only Quintana who was real.”
Both The
Year of Magical Thinking and Blue Nights are
recognizably memoirs of grief, but they’re rendered in Didion’s familiar remote
voice. It’s an oddly effective fit: Her coolness plays against the genre’s
sentimental excesses but still allows her to avoid argument and indulge in
open-ended reveries built from repetitions of painful facts. Didion has always
been a presence in her nonfiction, though ultimately a withdrawn (and
withdrawing) one, whose bafflement at the chaos of life is meant to stand in
for the reader’s. In Magical Thinking and especially in Blue
Nights, she represents her own unwillingness to reach conclusions as
the ultimate form of honesty. The result is a deeply personal book that still
feels strangely passive: Blue Nights articulates many
half-regrets but never a cohesive feeling that things could have gone
differently.
In July 2003, two months before Where I Was
From was published, Quintana married an older musician named Gerry Michael.
An evocative description of the ceremony, at St. John the Divine in Morningside
Heights, opens Blue Nights. It was—though Didion doesn’t say
so—supposed to mark the end of Quintana’s blue period and the beginning of the
stable, sober part of her life.
Five months later, Quintana was rushed to the
hospital with the flu and a fever of 103. Over the next few days she developed
pneumonia, then septic shock. She survived 50-50 odds but remained in intensive
care. By December 30, Dunne was distraught, talking tearfully to friends about
the ordeal, incredulous that the flu could turn into something like this. When
Lynn Nesbit found out through a mutual friend that something terrible had
happened, she was sure Quintana had died. Of course, it wasn’t Quintana. It was
Dunne, who dropped dead while Didion was fixing him a salad for dinner.
Quintana had to be told three times that her father
had died—twice in January, as she drifted in and out of consciousness, and once
more at UCLA Medical Center the following spring. The family finally held a
funeral for Dunne, also at St. John the Divine, on March 23, 2004. Two days
later, Quintana flew out to California with her husband—“to restart their
life,” as Didion wrote inMagical Thinking. When Didion said good-bye,
Quintana seemed anxious. While leaving the airport in Los Angeles, she
collapsed with a cerebral hemorrhage. Another month of touch-and-go
hospitalization left her partially paralyzed. After recovering yet again, she
came down with acute pancreatitis in the late spring of 2005. She died on
August 26.
Mystery surrounded the sequence of events—a mystery
Didion worried over inMagical Thinking and continues to worry over
today. Was it possible, as widespread rumor has it, that Quintana was drinking
on the flight to L.A., and that her fall might have been the result? Had
Quintana’s depression and her drinking contributed to her illnesses? “I think
they were probably intertwined,” says Susan Traylor. Was it the trauma of
Quintana’s fall that caused the blood vessel in her brain to rupture, or vice
versa? A surgeon told Didion the fall had come first, but Didion stubbornly
considered the question unsettled—as though she wanted it to remain that way,
more comfortable with the uncertainty. “I realized that the answer to the
question made no difference,” she wrote in Magical Thinking. “It
had happened. It was the new fact on the ground.”
“How many
vast shelves of literature are devoted to the misunderstandings between fathers
and sons and mothers and daughters,” asks Dickey, who wrote a memoir about his
own father and thinks it’s obvious why Magical Thinking was so
much easier to write. “When you have a partner, someone you love, who’s your
age, with the same terms of reference, and you are together for decades, you
really do understand each other,” he says. “Your child is never going to be
understood in that way.”
Didion agrees. “I guess I do know her better than
anyone else. But as well as I knew her, I barely touched knowing her,” she
says. “I couldn’t possibly have written a biography of her.”
What she has written instead is a kind of biography
of Joan Didion, and an elusive one at that. Like her novels, it’s more a work
of accumulation than of argument, at the end of which Quintana the grown-up
remains the enigma Didion must want her to be, while Didion is the woman
revealed. All of her fears are in it, and so is the central contradiction in all
of her work, laid bare: the fear of not knowing overlaid with the terror of
knowing.
“The goal of the book was to get it off my mind,”
says Didion of Blue Nights. But she contradicts herself just a
moment later by saying it was meant to “bring it back.” Anne Roiphe, one of the
authors who followed Didion into widow-memoir territory, wrote in her
book Epilogue, “I will be sad often but not always.” Didion
says she doesn’t feel that way about Quintana, at all. “I will be sad always,”
she says.
“I don’t think she’s a masochist,” says Dickey.
“But one of the things that happens when you write an intimate memoir, an
honest memoir, is that you think it will be cathartic—that you can say, ‘I have
now positioned this memory, and now I can move on.’ But very often it just
doesn’t work that way.”
I ask Didion if she knows herself better now.
“Yes,” she says. “I don’t know that there’s any value in knowing yourself
better, but I think I do. I don’t feel worse or better. It’s just there.”
I find this story both fascinating and disturbing, in large part because Didion denies the transformative impact of her work on her own life and thought. I find it personally intriguing as well because my own memoir involves my relationship with one of my daughters, who has a disability. I have always held to Rollo May's assertion in his book "The Courage to Create" that the writing we do provides feedback that enlarges us. Perhaps this was also the case for Didion, but she is just not interested in looking at her work in that way; i.e., as functioning in any manner smacks of self-help. And I can accept that, but only in part. There is a vast difference between self-help and the redemptive power of writing itself. That's why it takes courage to create -- particularly where memoir and poetry are concerned.
ReplyDelete